Enterprise
Evaluate one recurring exception
Find mismatches between order, payment and delivery records. An inspectable exception report from the records you supply. The synthetic workbench and stateless supplied-record comparison are free to evaluate. No wallet or payment is required. Start with the synthetic example, then run the comparison. Synthetic examples and internal tests are not customer outcomes or production reliability evidence.
A scoped comparison pilot
For a supported workflow, discuss these proposed deliverables:
- A field mapping for one agreed order, payment and delivery workflow.
- A reproducible comparison request and an inspectable JSON exception report for the agreed sample set.
- A handover explaining each finding, missing evidence and the next review action.
Agree expected mismatches and missing-evidence cases before work starts. Acceptance means the agreed sample set produces the expected findings and a report your team can retain and reproduce. Measure review time against your own baseline if that is a goal; no saving is assumed.
Purchasing and timing
A written quote must set the scope, sample handling, deliverables, acceptance criteria, start and delivery dates, price, currency and payment terms. Availability and organisational purchasing requirements are assessed before commitment; this page does not provide credit terms, a standing contract or a new paid plan. The contracting entity is Juana Limited · UK Company No. 14043409 · Coventry, United Kingdom.
Settlement-service billing is not activated for this synthetic evaluation workflow. Separate API checks settle per call in Base L2 USDC / Circle EURC (x402 v2); operators and enterprise workflows purchase instant ck_live_ card quota keys or $99 batch packs via Stripe (Operated by JUANA LIMITED, UK Co. No. 14043409). No fee is charged by this synthetic evaluation workflow. Existing identifier checks and other API tools are a separate legacy offer; inspect their current pricing and scope and live payment challenge before signing. Available payment methods are shown by the live checkout.
Evidence and security
- Non-custodial scope. The supplied-record comparison does not execute payments or hold funds. It compares the records you provide; it does not independently establish that settlement occurred.
- Route-specific evidence. Where an API returns a signed XDR-1 receipt, verify its signature and request/result binding using the documented format. An absent receipt remains absent. A valid signature authenticates the recorded claim under the signer's trust assumptions; it does not prove authorization, settlement, delivery or quality. Receipt verification is free. Check the published client limitation before relying on client verification output.
- Responsible disclosure. A published disclosure policy and a canonical security.txt. We aim to acknowledge reports in 5 business days; that is a target, not a contractual commitment.
- Data handling. The comparison handler is stateless; use synthetic or redacted samples for evaluation. Review the privacy draft and agree data-handling requirements before sharing sensitive records or beginning an engagement. Do not infer that stateless processing means infrastructure logs contain no metadata.
What this service does not establish
Comparison is not independent proof of authorization, settlement, delivery or quality. Existing identifier tools perform structural and checksum checks; they do not establish account ownership or entitlement. A null screening result means not screened, never clean. Neither the comparison nor those checks provide KYC, AML or sanctions clearance.
We publish no uptime or latency figures and make no service-level commitment that quotes them. Sustained scale, automatic payment, aggregate-budget enforcement and durable paid recovery are not demonstrated by this comparison workflow. Check the explicit acceptance scope for the current boundaries.
Procurement requirements
We hold no SOC 2 or ISO certification. Terms and privacy drafts remain pending counsel review. If your organisation requires reviewed terms, a data-processing agreement, certifications or specific service commitments, identify those requirements in the enquiry; do not treat them as available or agreed until they are confirmed in writing. An enquiry does not resolve those requirements.